Dan |
6 Comments |
Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 06:52AM No Associated Press content was harmed in the writing of this post
LATE UPDATE: I meant to include this as well:
A new report on the documents from George Washington University’s National Security Archive also presents compelling evidence that the Bush administration pressured the CIA and other intelligence agencies to tailor their reports to back-up Bush’s desire to invade. The report suggests the bulk of this effort was run out of Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, backing up numerous other post-war examinations of the path to invasion that saw Cheney as the mastermind of the plan to oust Saddam Hussein.So they began with the conclusion and walked it back from there.
First, some old news from back in May:
A report that mosques in Los Angeles and San Diego are under federal surveillance has resurrected fears in the Muslim community about government monitoring and led two civil rights groups Wednesday to call for congressional hearings.I kept waiting for more information on this, but nothing yet.
The request for public hearings followed a newspaper article last week that cited FBI and Defense Department files pertaining to surveillance of mosques and Muslims in Southern California.
Corey Saylor, Washington spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said the article in the San Diego Union-Tribune “has again raised concerns that our community is being watched.”
[snip]
Council chapters in Anaheim and San Diego joined the American Civil Liberties Union and Islamic Shura Council of Southern California in asking the U.S. House and Senate judiciary committees and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform for hearings. In a letter to the committee chairmen and ranking minority members, the groups said hearings are needed to determine the extent of the surveillance and whether people are being monitored because they are Muslim.
[snip]
The civil rights groups also want the hearings to determine if the U.S. military has engaged in domestic surveillance in violation of federal law. The Islamic Center of San Diego, where two of the 9/11 hijackers worshiped in early 2000, was the only mosque mentioned in the San Diego Union-Tribune article. The report did not specify which other mosques in Los Angeles and San Diego were allegedly under surveillance. But Saylor said it would not be surprising if mosques in Orange County were also monitored.
Since the 2001 terrorist attacks, members of the Islamic Center of Irvine and other local mosques have complained about FBI agents questioning them about imams’ sermons and how often they attend services. In 2006, J. Stephen Tidwell, then-FBI assistant director in Los Angeles, met at the Irvine mosque with about 200 people who questioned him about government monitoring.
The meeting was prompted by media reports that the FBI was monitoring Muslim students at UC Irvine and USC. Tidwell denied that monitoring was taking place, telling the audience that “we still play by the rules.”
A second bit of old news (via):
The pattern has become familiar: Customs officers wave in vehicles filled with illegal immigrants, drugs or other contraband. A Border Patrol agent acts as a scout for smugglers. Trusted officers fall prey to temptation and begin taking bribes.The “enforcement first” mentality may not take a very realistic view of human nature, and may just result in more federal law enforcement agents. Another small piece of the police state puzzle.
Sibel Edmonds is still around:
Again and again you see journalists in this country who think that their job consists of nothing more than phoning the FBI press office to ask for a comment. Only two journalists have spoken to actual first-hand sources about my case; David Rose who is British, and Joe Lauria working for a British newspaper. Why is it that only these two reporters were able to speak to sources at the Dept of Justice, at the FBI, and in Congress who are familiar with the details of my case?Good question.
Having been in the Peace Corps I find this depressing. Peace Corps Volunteers are, among other things, wonderful ambassadors abroad. Why again don’t we need a lot more of that?
Finally, I try to stay out of the election campaign, but I’d like to make the following prediction: Sometime during the upcoming Republican convention John Sidney McCain will change his name to Pohn Oidney WcCain.
Dan |
6 Comments |
Reader Comments (6)
Bah hahahahahaha! Yep, POW McCain should be renamed to:
Pohn Oidney WcCain!
Love it, Dan.
Love the content here, but I probably won't be back...the green type agains the light green and yellow backgrounds make it hard to read....also reminds me of the green screen behind McKrusty...Carl
I was just thinking about how much I like the color scheme of this page, unlike "wagonjak".
Goes to show you can't please everyone. I like this site.
Thanks Ratzo - I was starting to question my color choices. Readers, please let me know if you like or dislike the scheme; I thought it was a good look for the theme of "pruning back" but if it's unpleasant to look at I'll change it.
Interesting site. Since you asked, I like the color scheme, but would suggest a slightly paler green and the yellow not so bright.
Green is restful. The color used to avoid fights.
Pohn Oidney WcCain is the kind of name we used to make up as kids, only particularly apt this time. And it works. Psst! Pass it on!
As much as possible, we need to zero in on the media and do so seriously. Not a barrage of complaints but specific instances of media irresponsibility(and worse) such as you've pointed to, Dan. I'm really serious about this. A public radio listener, I'm horrified by their slipping standards.
I think and hope there will be a stink about Peace Corps cutbacks. On the other hand, cutting Newsweek from the budget (speaking of malign and irresponsible media!) is a definite plus!