A good part of the reason I started blogging was because I went to a history conference at a UT branch up between Dallas and Fort Worth and found that, contrary to belief, many well known academic historians have found community history projects to be invaluable because of their focus and details. Photos rated high. Photos with details rate high. Interviews with participants in events rated high. Interviews with older people rated high if you cover their experience and perspective.
- Prairie Weather


“Protest works. Just look at the proof”


The last place you will hear about the new American labor movement is in big American outlets.

Via lambert, via susie. See them, their blogrolls, Twitter hash tag #1u and just about any other outlet where citizens can get the word out.

The Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW)

The CIW is a community-based organization of mainly Latino, Mayan Indian and Haitian immigrants working in low-wage jobs throughout the state of Florida. Via.


Navigation
Login
Blogroll
Free MP3 sites

Be your own program director. Venture off the beaten path. Live a little.

2dopeboyz: Hip hop. (RSS)

3hive: Sharing the sharing. Free and legal MP3s from over 600 underground and undiscovered artists — new ones added daily. (RSS)

Amazon MP3 Download - Frequency: Weekly. Get the latest on Amazon MP3 music downloads - new releases, freshly ripped hits, and special deals.

Arjan writes - arjanwrites music blog. (RSS)

Audio Drums - A blog for rare, possibly overlooked, maybe forgotten gems of music with a slight emphasis on electronic and indie genres. (RSS)

Common Folk Music - A blog about music, not just folk music, but all music ranging from indie to alt-country to bluegrass, because music is for the “Common Folk”. (RSS)

Direct Current New Music - Adult pop, rock, singer/songwriters, folk, Americana, alt-country, adult alternative, soul, world music, crossover jazz and simply those artists that make us go “hmmm.”(RSS)

Discobelle.net (RSS)

FensePost - FensePost is an indie music blog based in the fertile lands between Seattle, WA and Vancouver, BC. (RSS)

Fiddlefreak Folk Music Blog - Folk, bluegrass, Celtic, and other music of the people. (RSS)

Gorilla Vs Bear (RSS)

Hillydilly: Simply Good Music. (RSS)

I Rock Cleveland: Indie Rock, College Rock, Alt Rock, Modern Rock, Cleveland Rock, and Rock. (RSS)

KEXP Song of the Day: KEXP 90.3 FM - where the music matters (RSS)

Line Of Best Fit - TLOBF.COM | Music Reviews, News, Interviews & Downloads (RSS)

Minnesota Public Radio Song of the Day: Music lovers from 89.3 The Current share songs with you each weekday. (RSS)

Muruch (RSS)

Music Like Dirt: Music in all its many forms, mp3’s, live reviews and photography. (RSS)

My Old Kentucky Blog - a music blog that parties with unicorns. (RSS)

Nah Right. (RSS)

ninebullets.net. (RSS)

Rollo & Grady: Los Angeles Music Blog, LA Music Blog (RSS)

Said the Gramophone: a music weblog (RSS)

SOULBOUNCE.COM (RSS)

Sounds Better With Reverb (RSS)

Stereogum: All the MP3s on Stereogum.com (RSS)

their bated breath (RSS)

Women of Hip Hop (RSS)


Mourn ya till I join ya

The Wheel’s Still In Spin: Focusing on new music releases and reviews of individual albums as original, fictional short stories (RSS)

A Fifty Cent Lighter & A Whiskey Buzz - This site is just a way for me to have a little fun and share a little music. I’ll highlight some of my favorite artists that I play on the radio and try to expound upon their music in ways I can’t always do on the air. (RSS)

Aminal Sound

Audiofile: Music Blog, Music Articles - Salon.com

Crossfade: The CNET music blog

GarageBand.com Folk top tracks (RSS)

GarageBand.com Hip Hop top tracks (RSS)

Flawless Hustle: Urban culture blog featuring artist interviews, music reviews, legal music downloads, street art, graffiti and more! (RSS)

Blogrolling

Reciprocation

The Jon Swift principle: “I will add anyone to my blogroll who adds me to theirs.” Email or leave a comment to let me know.

BLCKDGRD

The Hunting of the Snark



Sites participating in blogroll amnesty day

Jon Swift aka Al Weisel, may he rest in peace. Co-originator of Blogroll Amnesty Day

skippy the bush kangaroo (Co-originator of Blogroll Amnesty Day) (2012)

Vagabond Scholar (2012)
Occasional blogging, mostly of the long-form variety. Keeper of the Jon Swift Memorial Roundup (The Best Posts of the Year, Chosen by the Bloggers Themselves)

Notes From Underground (2012)

Redeye’s Front Page (2012)

Wisdom of the West (2012)

Zen Comix (2012)

pygalgia (2012)

Mikeb302000 (2012)

The Agonist (2012)

Brilliant At Breakfast (2012)

Bacon and Eggs (2012)

This Week in Tyranny

No Associated Press content was harmed in the writing of this post


LATE UPDATE: Marcy notes that DNI Mike McConnell and AG Michael Mukasey wrote: “As we have previously noted, any FISA modernization bill must contain effective legal protections for those companies sued because they are believed to have helped the Government prevent terrorist attacks in the aftermath of September 11, 2001.”  (My emphasis.)  Since the companies were doing surveillance before then as well wouldn’t they be subject to civil suits over any lawbreaking prior to 9/11?  (Last update: Marcy writes “My guess is the stuff that happened pre-9/11 had more to do with the hardware side of things, and less with the data mining and lack of probable cause. But that’s a guess.”  What that means as far as civil suits go is left to more knowledgable people than me.  Since there aren’t any lawsuits filed from that period there isn’t any smoking gun we know of.  And if I’m not mistaken the statute of limitations is five years, so all this could be moot anyway.  As I said, better minds.)


Larisa Alexandrovna has a lovely meditation on patriotism.  A naturalized citizen who puts us born here to shame.


According to Salon Richard Myers “helped quash dissent from across the U.S. military as the Bush administration first set up a brutal interrogation regime for terrorism suspects, according to newly public documents and testimony from an ongoing Senate probe.”  A few bad apples indeed.


LA Times: “A federal appeals court said Monday that the U.S. military improperly labeled a Chinese Muslim held at Guantanamo Bay an ‘enemy combatant’ and it ordered that he be released, transferred or granted a new hearing.”  Your War On Terror dollars at work.


Here’s a quick review of the moral bankruptcy on the right when it comes to civil rights.  The story:

A federal judge in San Francisco dismissed a lawsuit Wednesday that sought to prove President Bush acted illegally in 2001 when he ordered the wiretapping of phone calls between Americans and suspected foreign terrorists without court approval. 

The only reaction I could find on the right:

I always love it when activists sue over some alleged harm to them, but find that they can only articulate the harm in the most general terms. Was the harm here that they were being wiretapped (because it was believed they were diverting funds to terrorists) or that they knew they were being wiretapped?

(Don Surber didn’t comment directly on it, but he did demonstrate that he’s incapable of understanding a story containing more than one fact.)  There’s a good segment of the right that literally does not believe in liberty, as evidenced by a “if you’re not doing anything wrong you shouldn’t worry about being monitored” attitude.  In other words, authoritarian.  The assumption for those who believe in liberty is that the government doesn’t get to crawl up your ass with a flashlight unless there’s a damn good reason that can be demonstrated in a court of law if need be.


Read this relentlessly dishonest editorial from the Washington Post to get an idea of just how abysmal commentary on the FISA bill has been.

We understand the heartfelt arguments of those who believe that closing the courthouse door to Americans who claim the warrantless wiretapping invaded their privacy rights represents “an abandonment of the rule of law,” as Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) said last month.

But the fact remains that no one can claim with certainty that his or her communications were monitored…The telecommunications companies complied with a government request after being assured, in writing, that the activities had been authorized by the president and deemed lawful by the attorney general.

Simply wretched.  Cato has a good takedown but this was some seriously low-hanging fruit.


Finally on a non-executive power note, this from our President: “We’re strong dollar people in this administration.”  Listen, dummy: The value of the dollar is not something you have faith in like God or WMD in Iraq but something that exists independently of your thoughts on the matter.  And if you really want for that value to be high then you don’t spend eight years cutting taxes and increasing spending and ignoring deficits as they mount.  The fact that we’re taking our wallets into the bathroom with us in case we’re out of White Cloud is on you, baby, and you ain’t talking your way out of it.

Senate Contact Information

Information grabbed from the Contacting the Congress page. Let ‘em know who you are. You may download the HTML for this table over here. Feel free to copy and paste anywhere you’d like. Alphabetically by state:

Member Name State Party DC Phone DC FAX Electronic Correspondence
Shelby, Richard AL R 202-224-5744 202-224-3416 http://shelby.senate.gov/resources/contact.htm
Sessions, Jeff AL R 202-224-4124 202-224-3149 http://sessions.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ConstituentServices.ContactMe
Stevens, Ted AK R 202-224-3004 202-224-2354 http://stevens.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.EmailSenatorStevens
Murkowski, Lisa AK R 202-224-6665 202-224-5301 http://murkowski.senate.gov/contact.cfm
McCain, John AZ R 202-224-2235 202-228-2862 http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Kyl, Jon AZ R 202-224-4521 202-224-2207 http://kyl.senate.gov/contact.cfm
Lincoln, Blanche Lambert AR D 202-224-4843 202-228-1371 http://lincoln.senate.gov/webform.html
Pryor, Mark AR D 202-224-2353 202-228-0908 http://pryor.senate.gov/contact/
Feinstein, Dianne CA D 202-224-3841 202-228-3954 http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.EmailMe
Boxer, Barbara CA D 202-224-3553 202-224-0454 http://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm
Allard, Wayne CO R 202-224-5941 202-224-6471 http://allard.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Salazar, Ken CO D 202-224-5852 202-228-5036 http://salazar.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm
Dodd, Christopher CT D 202-224-2823 202-224-1083 http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3128&cat=Opinion
Lieberman, Joseph CT ID 202-224-4041 202-224-9750 http://lieberman.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm?regarding=issue
Biden, Joseph DE D 202-224-5042 202-224-0139 http://biden.senate.gov/services/contact/
Carper, Thomas DE D 202-224-2441 202-228-2190 http://carper.senate.gov/contact/
Nelson, Bill FL D 202-224-5274 202-228-2183 http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm
Martinez, Mel FL R 202-224-3041 202-228-5171 http://martinez.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInformation.ContactForm
Chambliss, Saxby GA R 202-224-3521 202-224-0103 http://chambliss.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.ContactForm&CFID=51026269&CFTOKEN=46757234
Isakson, Johnny GA R 202-224-3643 202-228-0724 http://isakson.senate.gov/contact.cfm
Inouye, Daniel HI D 202-224-3934 202-224-6747 http://inouye.senate.gov/abtform.html
Akaka, Daniel HI D 202-224-6361 202-224-2126 http://akaka.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Craig, Larry ID R 202-224-2752 202-228-1067 http://craig.senate.gov/webform.cfm
Crapo, Mike ID R 202-224-6142 202-228-1375 http://crapo.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm
Durbin, Richard IL D 202-224-2152 202-228-0400 http://durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm
Obama, Barack IL D 202-224-2854 202-228-4260 http://obama.senate.gov/contact/
Lugar, Richard IN R 202-224-4814 202-228-0360 senator_lugar@lugar.senate.gov
Bayh, Evan IN D 202-224-5623 202-228-1377 http://bayh.senate.gov/contact/email/
Grassley, Charles IA R 202-224-3744 202-224-6020 http://grassley.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Harkin, Tom IA D 202-224-3254 202-224-9369 http://harkin.senate.gov/c/
Brownback, Sam KS R 202-224-6521 202-228-1265 http://brownback.senate.gov/CMEmailMe.cfm
Roberts, Pat KS R 202-224-4774 202-224-3514 http://roberts.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInformation.EmailPat
McConnell, Mitch KY R 202-224-2541 202-224-2499 http://mcconnell.senate.gov/contact_form.cfm
Bunning, Jim KY R 202-224-4343 202-228-1373 http://bunning.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Landrieu, Mary LA D 202-224-5824 202-224-9735 http://landrieu.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
Vitter, David LA R 202-224-4623 202-228-5061 http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=webformIQV1
Snowe, Olympia ME R 202-224-5344 202-224-1946 http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorSnowe.Email
Collins, Susan ME R 202-224-2523 202-224-2693 http://collins.senate.gov/public/continue.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorCollins.Email&CFID=31278970&CFTOKEN=44699849
Mikulski, Barbara MD D 202-224-4654 202-224-8858 http://mikulski.senate.gov/Contact/contact.cfm
Cardin, Benjamin MD D 202-224-4524 202-224-1651 http://cardin.senate.gov/contact/
Kennedy, Edward MA D 202-224-4543 202-224-2417 http://kennedy.senate.gov/senator/contact.cfm
Kerry, John MA D 202-224-2742 202-224-8525 http://kerry.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm
Levin, Carl MI D 202-224-6221 202-224-1388 http://levin.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
Stabenow, Debbie MI D 202-224-4822 202-228-0325 http://stabenow.senate.gov/email.cfm
Coleman, Norm MN R 202-224-5641 202-224-1152 http://coleman.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Klobuchar, Amy MN D 202-224-3244 202-228-2186 http://klobuchar.senate.gov/emailamy.cfm
Cochran, Thad MS R 202-224-5054 202-224-9450 http://cochran.senate.gov/contact.htm
Wicker, Roger MS R 202-224-6253 202-228-0378 http://wicker.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactMe.EmailSenatorWicker
Bond, Kit MO R 202-224-5721 202-224-8149 http://bond.senate.gov/contact/contactme.cfm
McCaskill, Claire MO D 202-224-6154 202-228-6326 http://mccaskill.senate.gov/contact/
Baucus, Max MT D 202-224-2651 202-224-0515 http://baucus.senate.gov/contact/emailForm.cfm?subj=issue
Tester, Jon MT D 202-224-2644 202-224-8594 http://tester.senate.gov/Contact/index.cfm
Hagel, Chuck NE R 202-224-4224 202-224-5213 http://hagel.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Nelson, Ben NE D 202-224-6551 202-228-0012 http://bennelson.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm
Reid, Harry NV D 202-224-3542 202-224-7327 http://reid.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
Ensign, John NV R 202-224-6244 202-228-2193 http://ensign.senate.gov/forms/email_form.cfm
Gregg, Judd NH R 202-224-3324 202-224-4952 http://gregg.senate.gov/sitepages/contact.cfm
Sununu, John NH R 202-224-2841 202-228-4131 mailbox@sununu.senate.gov
Lautenberg, Frank NJ D 202-224-3224 202-228-4054 http://lautenberg.senate.gov/contact/
Menendez, Robert NJ D 202-224-4744 202-228-2197 http://menendez.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm
Domenici, Pete NM R 202-224-6621 202-228-3261 http://domenici.senate.gov/contact/contactform.cfm
Bingaman, Jeff NM D 202-224-5521 202-224-2852 http://bingaman.senate.gov/contact/types/email-issue.cfm
Schumer, Charles NY D 202-224-6542 202-228-3027 http://schumer.senate.gov/SchumerWebsite/contact/webform.cfm
Clinton, Hillary Rodham NY D 202-224-4451 202-228-0282 http://clinton.senate.gov/contact/webform.cfm
Dole, Elizabeth NC R 202-224-6342 202-224-1100 http://dole.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInformation.ContactForm
Burr, Richard NC R 202-224-3154 202-228-2981 http://burr.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Conrad, Kent ND D 202-224-2043 202-224-7776 https://conrad.senate.gov/contact/webform.cfm
Dorgan, Byron ND D 202-224-2551 202-224-1193 senator@dorgan.senate.gov
Voinovich, George OH R 202-224-3353 202-228-1382 http://voinovich.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Brown, Sherrod OH D 202-224-2315 202-228-6321 http://brown.senate.gov/contact/
Inhofe, James OK R 202-224-4721 202-228-0380 http://inhofe.senate.gov/contactus.htm
Coburn, Tom OK R 202-224-5754 202-224-6008 http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorCoburn.Home
Wyden, Ron OR D 202-224-5244 202-228-2717 http://wyden.senate.gov/contact/
Smith, Gordon OR R 202-224-3753 202-228-3997 http://gsmith.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Specter, Arlen PA R 202-224-4254 202-228-1229 http://specter.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Casey, Robert PA D 202-224-6324 202-228-0604 http://casey.senate.gov/contact/
Reed, Jack RI D 202-224-4642 202-224-4680 http://reed.senate.gov/contact/contact-share.cfm
Whitehouse, Sheldon RI D 202-224-2921 202-228-6362 http://whitehouse.senate.gov/contact.cfm
Graham, Lindsey SC R 202-224-5972 202-224-3808 http://lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.EmailSenatorGraham
DeMint, James SC R 202-224-6121 202-228-5143 http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Johnson, Tim SD D 202-224-5842 202-228-5765 http://johnson.senate.gov/contact/
Thune, John SD R 202-224-2321 202-228-5429 http://thune.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Email
Alexander, Lamar TN R 202-224-4944 202-228-3398 http://alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.Home
Corker, Bob TN R 202-224-3344 202-228-0566 http://corker.senate.gov/Contact/index.cfm
Hutchison, Kay Bailey TX R 202-224-5922 202-224-0776 http://hutchison.senate.gov/contact.cfm
Cornyn, John TX R 202-224-2934 202-228-2856 http://cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Hatch, Orrin UT R 202-224-5251 202-224-6331 http://hatch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Offices.Contact
Bennett, Robert UT R 202-224-5444 202-228-1168 http://bennett.senate.gov/contact/email_opinion.cfm
Leahy, Patrick VT D 202-224-4242 202-224-3479 senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov
Sanders, Bernie VT I 202-224-5141 202-228-0776 http://www.sanders.senate.gov/comments/
Warner, John VA R 202-224-2023 202-224-6295 http://warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Webb, James VA D 202-224-4024 202-228-6363 http://webb.senate.gov/contact/
Murray, Patty WA D 202-224-2621 202-224-0238 http://murray.senate.gov/email/index.cfm
Cantwell, Maria WA D 202-224-3441 202-228-0514 http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm
Byrd, Robert WV D 202-224-3954 202-228-0002 http://byrd.senate.gov/byrd_email.html
Rockefeller, John WV D 202-224-6472 202-224-7665 http://rockefeller.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm
Kohl, Herb WI D 202-224-5653 202-224-9787 http://kohl.senate.gov/gen_contact.html
Feingold, Russell WI D 202-224-5323 202-224-2725 http://feingold.senate.gov/contact_opinion.html
Enzi, Michael WY R 202-224-3424 202-228-0359 http://enzi.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInformation.EmailSenatorEnzi
Barrasso, John WY R 202-224-6441 202-224-1724 http://barrasso.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.ContactForm

Time To Create Some Martyrs

Our President seems to believe not in oversight but in “accountability moments” every four years when the population gives a strict up-or-down judgment on his performance. A thumbs up means a mandate for the entire platform. In some cases like Social Security and immigration the changes are shot down by a growing popular revolt, but essentially the whole package is considered affirmed. At that point Congress passes laws as directed by the President to properly implement the platform, and each policy is a black box to be blessed in the broadest possible terms with no debate or review involved. If Congress doesn’t like that setup it is free to use the power of the purse to shut off funding and force voters to pick sides; the loser gets run into a ditch.

The results of such an audacious concept have been especially clear this week. First up is Seymour Hersh’s blockbuster article in the New Yorker describing how the administration has bypassed Congress in its efforts to begin a war with Iran. Basically, Congress authorized money for covert operations to destabilize the Iranian government. Covert ops go through the CIA, but the CIA is required to report to Congress and is also the intelligence agency with the least enthusiasm for helping the White House invent convenient stories. Probably either of these is unacceptable and together are intolerable. So the activities were funnelled through the military, and suddenly no one on Capitol Hill needed to be told anything. Hersh’s sources sound almost comically naïve: “Senior Democrats in Congress told me that they had concerns about the possibility that their understanding of what the new operations entail differs from the White House’s.” The administration has continuously demonstrated its “different understanding” of its need to submit to oversight since it took office. Your concerns are only beginning to dawn now?

Next, consider the news that the House Oversight Committee issued subpoenas for the President and Vice President’s interview records from Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald. It was issued because we still don’t know all the relevant details over the compromising of a CIA operative. Since such an action has real (as opposed to fictional) national security implications it is important to know exactly what happened. Of course, finding out exactly what happened would put the administration somewhere on the political spectrum between Approval Rating Below The Mendoza Line and Would You Rather Resign Or Be Impeached? Perhaps unsurprisingly the DOJ flat out said it would not comply.

Here is where we get to the crux of the matter. I hate to put it in such stark and extreme terms, but the question Congress must now answer is, are you with the Constitution or with the President? The two have become irreconcilably opposed. I have basically accepted that Congress has by its actions declared itself in favor of all of the President’s major policies. It approves of continuing in Iraq to the indefinite future, of torture, of warrantless wiretaps and “basket” warrants that make a mockery of the 4th Amendment, and so on. But right now its very relevance as a body is being challenged. I am all but certain that even a rump GOP would be able to effectively sound the alarms and shriek at the imperial (get used to that word) actions of a President Obama who makes obvious and logical use of powers currently being established. That would not mean our system of checks and balances was being upheld, however. It would just mean that Republicans are still able to shape the Washington narrative even as a nearly crippled minority.

Upholding the system requires action now, and it needs to be more than issuing paper to a contemptuous executive. If Congress really wants to defend its role and re-establish its relevance then the only options left are direct confrontation: Slap handcuffs on Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten and let them sit in the House jail. Have the Senate Judiciary Committee vote on a contempt citation for Karl Rove, give him a deadline and tell him he will join his erstwhile companions if he does not show up. And yes, begin suggesting that the Attorney General may end up there as well if he continues to defy them. Let the right turn any of them into a cause célèbre if they want; let GOP leaders in Congress rush to their defense if so moved. Let the White House be the ones appealing to judges for relief for a change. There is too much at stake for Congress to continue its weak protestations. If nothing changes it will be responsible for a terrible precedent: That a President can, with enough arrogance, bullying and defiance, ignore Congress with impunity.

This Week in Tyranny

No Associated Press content was harmed in the writing of this post


Kagro X gives a fantastic overview of Senate procedure in “So what’s up with ‘holds’ in the Senate, anyway?” Kagro clearly has spent some time in D.C. and wouldn’t it be loverly if everyone who did so was as willing to give those of us in the hinterlands a look inside our government’s machinery?


The Senate is of particular concern because the FISA vote is set for July 8th.  Tell your reps and Democratic leaders to strip telecom amnesty from it.  Emails are fine, phone calls are better, faxes better still because they take up space in Congressional offices, and money is best of all because, well, it’s money.  FaxZero allows you to send two free faxes per day, and Senator Obama’s fax number is (202) 228-4260.  Feel free to send requests for a belated birthday present to America.


Spencer Ackerman has a nice review of Addington and Yoo’s testimony.  It is hard to overstate the damage these men have done to our Constitution, our government and most importantly our values.   They are key players in our descent into state sponsored torture.  We still are largely ignorant of the worst abuses; if that changes get ready for the ultimate test of the “nobody could have known” rationalization.


The Justice Department is turning into a playground for party hacks with third rate minds.


It looks like the National Applications Office may be having trouble (via) getting off the ground.  My previous thoughts on the matter here.


Finally (deep breath) I’m going to go a little out of my depth and make a gender-based observation.  I’ve probably internalized the belief of women as the more tender-hearted and sensitive gender as well as anyone, so off the top of my head I would have expected to see a nearly unanimous endorsement by them defending anything aimed (even just ostensibly) at protecting children.  For issues as emotionally charged as pornography and rape I expected an almost reflexive defense of such laws and procedures, but in three separate cases this week I saw just the opposite.  Avedon, digby and Ruth each separated claims from facts and refused to get carried away.  All three took a clear eyed (and in Avedon’s case searingly honest) look at what was being done and what the likely impact would be.  It could be that I’m just reading left leaning sources and seeing the usual talking points repeated.  On the other hand I saw a number of liberals (for example) take positions on Heller that were decidedly not “typical” liberal positions.  I think there’s more at play here.  I may just need to stop dragging my knuckles, but I was very surprised by what I learned this week.

The Democrats' Risky Strategy

No Associated Press content was harmed in the writing of this post

Thinking back, it is hard to believe Ross Perot nearly upturned the two party system in 1992. He received almost 19% of the vote, which was more than an independent had received since 1912 - when a former President ran. Perot had a staggering array of disadvantages: The absence of even a bare bones third party infrastructure, no political experience whatsoever, an untelegenic face and somewhat high pitched (and grating) voice, a running mate who seemed simultaneously authentic and buffoonish, and a continually prickly reaction to the prying and publicity that comes with any serious bid for the White House. And then of course there was the epic freakout. Ahead in the polls, he abruptly dropped out of the race, then dropped back in several weeks later and accused the Republicans of trying to sabotage his daughter’s wedding. He seemed, literally, to be having a nervous breakdown in full public view. And after all that he still captured nearly a fifth of the electorate!

He had some advantages as well obviously. Sometimes in politics anti-charisma can be charisma. Washington has famously been described as Hollywood for ugly people; physical disadvantages can come across as genuine, the common touch, lack of affectation and so on. He was also in possession of a gigantic pile of money. A good chunk of it came via government contracts, but he still successfully played the “private sector hero” card. He also used his money exceptionally well - in addition to other spending he bought entire 30 minute blocks of time and used them to focus on the issue that catapulted him to popularity seemingly overnight: The budget deficit. Americans were terribly anxious over the unwillingness of our leaders to pay for their spending (seems quaint now doesn’t it?) and Perot focused on it to the exclusion of just about everything else. And people responded with wild enthusiasm. His disadvantages were substantially muted because he spoke directly and maturely to an issue of vital importance to many of his countrymen.

Now, there are plenty of dissimilarities in 2008. I don’t think Bob Barr is the second coming of Perot; at this point in the 1992 cycle the “Ross For Boss” rocket had already launched. Also, if anyone was going to catch lightning in a bottle this time I think it would have been Ron Paul, who no longer has an obvious route to the ballot. And while the GOP base is suspicious with a “waited his turn” nominee and a lot of Democrats are fired up about a charismatic newcomer, these parallels are mostly superficial.

What is real and very similar, though, is the restlessness of a good part of the electorate. Last week may have seen the start of a new alliance between civil libertarian-minded citizens on the right and the left with the creation of The Strange Bedfellows. It began largely in response to the FISA reform bill, and look at the events surrounding it: Steny Hoyer negotiated it behind closed doors, introduced it and less than 24 hours later engineered a vote (with the blessing of Nancy Pelosi), all in the face of outrage from the left. A site was created for contributions to oppose it and it raised six figures literally overnight. Democratic capitulation on the burgeoning surveillance state has created tension that seeks an outlet. The party’s continued rubber stamp of the President’s hugely unpopular Iraq policy is another source of tremendous frustration.

Democrats are playing a dangerous game. They apparently reason that Republicans will bear the brunt of dissatisfaction over Washington’s unpopular policies. That may well be true. The GOP faces a disaster this year because they gained control of all major parts of government and then engaged in an orgy of excess, alienating moderates and depressing their loyalists. Having achieved their electoral goal they spent all their credibility very quickly. Democrats seem to be in the process of a sellout of a different sort. They seized control of both houses of Congress but seem oblivious (or indifferent) to the public’s anger. Instead they seem to be playing a game of political jujitsu, using the overexertions of the right to give them leverage to flip them totally off the mat. It may be a brilliant tactical move but one with long term risks. First, urgent policy issues fester because no meaningful action can happen under such a strategy. That leads to the second problem, deep dissatisfaction with what comes to be seen as a lesser of two evils. By eschewing opposition the Democrats are creating a pool of thwarted activists. Such people are primed to create new realities or respond to the latest version of a quirky billionaire with homemade charts. I’ve written before about the Republicans’ implosion; the ground may be shifting underneath the Democrats as well.